Edukasi Literasi Gizi Berbasis EthnoSTEM-Gamifikasi untuk Guru dan Siswa SMP dalam Mendukung Program Makan Bergizi Gratis

Ina Ana Khoeriah; Nadila Fetina; Eka Andrayani; Yogi Yuliada

doi:10.58266/jpmb.v4i3.1208

Authors

Ina Ana Khoeriah Universitas Muhammadiyah Bogor Raya, Indonesia
Nadila Fetina Universitas Muhammadiyah Bogor Raya, Indonesia
Eka Andrayani Universitas Muhammadiyah Bogor Raya, Indonesia
Yogi Yuliada Universitas Muhammadiyah Bogor Raya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58266/jpmb.v4i3.1208

Keywords:

Literasi Gizi, EthnoSTEM, Gamifikasi, Program Makan Bergizi Gratis: PKM

Abstract

Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) merupakan program prioritas nasional pemerintahan Indonesia periode 2024-2029 yang menargetkan 82,9 juta peserta didik dengan anggaran 71 triliun rupiah. Namun, implementasinya menghadapi tantangan berupa minimnya edukasi literasi gizi yang menyertai pemberian makanan, sehingga siswa hanya menjadi penerima pasif. SMP Al Ijtihad Cimayang Kabupaten Bogor sebagai mitra pengabdian menghadapi permasalahan tersebut, meliputi: belum tersedianya media edukasi gizi yang kontekstual, guru IPA belum mampu mengintegrasikan pembelajaran gizi dengan kearifan lokal pangan, serta rendahnya literasi gizi siswa. Solusi yang ditawarkan adalah edukasi literasi gizi berbasis EthnoSTEM-Gamifikasi, mencakup: pelatihan guru IPA, sosialisasi literasi gizi melalui Card Game Edukatif berbasis EthnoSTEM, dan pendampingan penggunaan modul serta card game dalam mendukung program MBG. Metode pelaksanaan menggunakan pendekatan participatory action melalui workshop sehari dengan peserta 5 guru IPA dan 20 siswa kelas VIII. Target luaran meliputi peningkatan pengetahuan guru minimal 80%, peningkatan literasi gizi siswa minimal 75%, tersedianya media edukasi di sekolah mitra, serta publikasi ilmiah. Kegiatan ini merupakan diseminasi hasil penelitian dosen yang telah menghasilkan Modul IPA dan Card Game Edukatif berbasis EthnoSTEM yang telah tervalidasi. Program ini diharapkan menjadi model edukasi gizi yang dapat direplikasi di sekolah pelaksana MBG lainnya.

References

Ajzen, I. (2011). The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Healt, 26(9), 1113–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.11.001

Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105.

Chevalier M., J, & B. J. . (2019). Participatory Action Research (2 nd). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351033268

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. In Learning Policy Institute. ttps://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Effective_Teacher_Professional_Development_REPORT.pdf

Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5

Dudley, D. A., Cotton, W. G., & Peralta, L. R. (2015). Teaching approaches and strategies that promote healthy eating in primary school children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(28). ttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0182-8

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hamari J, Koivisto J, S. H. (2020). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In: 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 3025–3034. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2020.377

Hermans, R. C. J., Smit, K., de Bruin, S.,";"; Fevrier, B., de Vries, H., & Conner, M. (2018). The effects of a nutrition education card game on children’s knowledge and willingness to try vegetables. Nutrients, 10(4), 515. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10040515

Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (2023). Laporan nasional riset kesehatan dasar (Riskesdas) 2023.

Khoeriah, I. A., Putri, D. A. K., & Yunitasari, A. R. (2026). Unlocking Scientific Reasoning through Ethno-STEM : Mapping the Research Landscape and Future Directions. Biocaster : Jurnal Kajian Biologi, 6(1), 659–673. https://doi.org/10.36312/biocaster.v6i1.1104

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2016). Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.134

Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315816951

Noda S, Shirotsuki K, N. M. (2021). The effectiveness of a Card Game-based nutrition education program on food and nutrient intake in Japanese adolescent. Nutrients, 13(8), 2740. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082740

Noda, S., Shirotsuki, K., & Nakao, M. (2019). The effectiveness of intervention with board games: A systematic review. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 13(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-019-0164-1

Novak, J. D. (2011). A theory of education: Meaningful learning underlies the constructive integration of thinking, feeling, and acting. Meaningful Learning Review, 1(2), 1–14.

Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-5

Popkin, B. M., Adair, L. S., & Ng, S. W. (2012). Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutrition Reviews, 70(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00961.x

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Sailer M., and H. L. (2020). Gamifikasi Pembelajaran: sebuah Meta-analisis. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, 32(1), 77–112. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w

Sudarmin S, Selia E, U. R. (2023). Reconstructing local wisdom through ethno-STEM learning: Enhancing students’ critical thinking. J Innov Sci Educ, 12(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v12i1.64285

Sudarmin S, Zahro QF, Nurhayati N, et al. (2023). Integration of Ethno-STEM in chemistry learning: A meta-analysis study. Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(3), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i3.45678

Vaitkeviciute, R., Ball, L. E., & Harris, N. (2015). The relationship between food literacy and dietary intake in adolescents: A systematic review. Public Health Nutrition, 18(4), 649–658. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014000962

Vangrieken K.,, Meredith C., K. E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teching and Teacher Education, 61(8), 47–59. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001

Vidgen, H. A., & Gallegos, D. (2014). Defining food literacy and its components. Appetite, 76, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.01.010

World Health Organization. (2018). Global School-based Student Health Survey Timor-Leste 2015 Fact Sheet (Vol. 2). https://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/gshs/indonesia/en/

Yusuf, M., & Widodo, A. (2023). EthnoSTEM approach in science education: A systematic literature review. Indonesian Journal of Science and Technology, 81(1), 73–92.